专栏银行业

Cultural clash reflects why banks must split up, says former Citi chief

If anybody is qualified to judge the success of combining investment and commercial banks in the same institution, it is John Reed. As chief executive of Citicorp in the 1980s and 1990s, he evangelised the attempt to create a “one-stop shop” selling many different products and took the bank into its merger with Travelers Group to form Citigroup in 1998.

That deal redefined banking in the US and triggered a repeal of the old Glass-Steagall split between investment and commercial banking in the US, which some critics blame for being the root cause of the 2008 financial crisis. Now politicians in the US are attempting to reintroduce the split, saying that Glass-Steagall’s repeal contributed to the financial disaster. Citigroup needed several injections of capital from the US government in the fraught months after the Lehman bankruptcy.

Now retired, Mr Reed believes the business logic behind the transaction was flawed, and that the old Glass-Steagall division should be reinstated. Mr Reed first expressed this view soon after the crisis erupted. Last year Sandy Weill, the other main architect of the Citicorp-Travelers deal, changed his position to support breaking up the banks.

您已阅读24%(1189字),剩余76%(3816字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

约翰•奥瑟兹

约翰•奥瑟兹(John Authers)是英国《金融时报》的Lex主编,是manbetx app苹果 最具影响力的金融市场专家之一。他于1990年加入FT,曾经担任美国市场编辑、美国银行记者和墨西哥分社社长。奥瑟兹毕业于牛津大学,并且拥有哥伦比亚大学的MBA学位。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×