观点居家办公

Invested in the WFH argument? Home in on the evidence

Empirically robust trials are particularly important in evaluating social and economic interventions

The writer is a science commentator

It was striking to read this week that many Gen Z workers regard video calls as “face-to-face” meetings. The older segment of this cohort — born in the late 1990s, raised on social media and coming of age in the Covid-19 pandemic — often have a distinctive take on many aspects of office life, such as corporate loyalty (meh) and work-life balance (100 per cent).

They generally expect at least some remote working, an aspiration at odds with the many companies and executives who prefer employees in the office. Now, a new study has found that hybrid working, with three days in the office and two at home, does not lower performance or hinder promotion prospects — and may save money by improving retention.

您已阅读16%(743字),剩余84%(3810字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×