观点就业

Pity the policymakers in the AI jobs tsunami

Instead of retraining those who lose work, politicians could help people take matters into their own hands

You’re standing on the beach in the dark, trying to guess whether the next wave, which you can already hear, is going to sweep everyone off their feet, or peter out and merely tickle your toes. This must be roughly how it feels to be a policymaker this year — deeply unsure about what is coming for the labour market, let alone what to do about it.

Kristalina Georgieva, managing director of the IMF, has said that artificial intelligence is “already like a tsunami hitting the labour market”. Ford chief executive Jim Farley thinks AI is going to replace “literally half of all white-collar workers” in the US.

And yet there are counter-signals too: a study of 25,000 workers and 7,000 workplaces in Denmark has found that rapid corporate adoption of generative AI chatbots in 2023 and 2024 had “no significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation” and “minimal” economic impacts overall. Even within professions, the signs are mixed. Generative AI seems well suited to replacing the work of junior lawyers, for example. Yet salaries for newly qualified lawyers are surging. You don’t have to be an economist to know that the price of something doesn’t usually go up when demand for it goes down.

您已阅读23%(1213字),剩余77%(4080字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×